On PED’s in sport.

(The following article is one I mostly completed last year but haven’t gotten around to posting until now… if there are any discrepancies in the context, that’ll be why. Still, I wanted to publish it here in case anyone finds interest in reading it. One can only hope.)

In 2016 we saw what was branded as another ‘summer of sport’, with Euro 2016 in June-July followed by the Brazil Olympics throughout August. With Russian athletes almost universally banned (at least until said ban was, to some extent, overturned on appeal) from this year’s Olympic Games due to alleged state-sponsored doping, and with numerous other instances of athletes in sports like tennis and MMA (mixed martial arts) recently caught using banned substances, the issue of performance enhancing drugs has never been more prevalent than it is now.

That’s not because more people are ‘cheating’ now than athletes of the past. On the contrary, I believe with the more stringent testing available today, the amount of athletes trying to manipulate the system has fallen. Yet at the same time competition has never been higher, with multi-million dollar sponsorship available for the best, most successful athletes, and without a doubt, as testing methods improve, so too do the range of drugs available that can slip through the system. It is a constant battle for testing methods to keep up with PED’s on the market.

I figured I would use this space to offer my thoughts on this controversial issue of performance enhancers. That’s what they are; my thoughts and nothing more. I don’t intend it to be a conclusive, in-depth article, but if what I write can help others think more critically about a certain topic, I can’t help but do it.

For me personally, the topic became prevalent again recently when one of my favourite athletes, Brock Lesnar, tested positive for a banned substance while training for, and on the night of, his UFC fight with Mark Hunt on July 9th. But this is not something I write as a ‘fan’ of someone or because I want to defend anyone who breaks the rules. Rather, it’s that I want others, people like you and I, to understand that this issue isn’t as cut and dry as most seem to think. It’s not always – if ever – a black and white divide between ‘cheating’ and being totally ‘clean’. Let’s talk about the reasons why.

Brock Lesnar tested positive for a banned substance after having been granted a 3 month exemption by USADA before his big fight.
Brock Lesnar tested positive for a banned substance after having been granted a 3 month exemption by USADA before his big fight.

As obvious as this may sound, there are many different forms and variations of performance enhancers out there. It’s not too dissimilar from the range of vitamins and supplements available; the line is drawn when the effect of a certain substance is deemed to give an unfair advantage over those who don’t take it. Whereas I think the line should instead be drawn with substances that endanger an athlete’s long-term health.

But that doesn’t mean I’m in favour of unfair advantages; quite the opposite. In simple terms, I think athletes should be given a list of legal substances they can use by their allocated governing bodies. These substances would be tested and approved beforehand, to ensure they aren’t a danger to the health of an athlete. Said substances would be available to use as each athlete sees fit.

Granted, this isn’t too different from what happens currently: athletes are given a list of ‘banned’ substances, and things are added to or removed from this list dependent upon how much of an advantage they give in terms of performance enhancement. But the policy on this is generally zero tolerance on anything that is seen to give said advantage. I think this leaves room for abuse by athletes who have the resources to ‘slip through the gap’ as such with the latest designer drugs – who would not be motivated to take such a risk if there were allocated drugs available to use for each athlete rather than confined strictly to the banned list.

This isn’t me trying to make excuses for those who break the rules. Think of it more as an argument for those who don’t; those who end up at a natural disadvantage just for sticking to their principles, for reasons they’ve had drilled into them – that all PED’s are wrong – and a way of removing the advantage given to those who simply have greater resources at their disposal.

It’s also an argument in favour of the integrity and enjoyment level of sport itself. The larger-than-life athletes of the past and present that people know and love, who’ve inspired millions with their feats, may not have been who they became were it not for performance enhancers. Of course people may feel aghast at even the suggestion their heroes would do such a thing, but how can you be sure they didn’t, aside from wishful thinking and their carefully constructed public perception?

If rules around performance enhancers continue to become more stringent – unnecessarily in many cases – sporting heroes of the future likely won’t be seen in the same light. The general aesthetic value and marketability of sport will inevitably go down. My argument is for the integrity of sport and evenly balanced competition across the board, not against it. We need more openness, better transparency, and most importantly, more easily accessible information on the PED’s we’re talking about, for the benefit not only of the public, but also the athletes who need to be aware of what they’re taking. You may think it obvious that they would naturally know what they put in their bodies and what exactly those things do, but bear in mind most top athletes have specialists taking care of this stuff for them; specialists whose success is tied directly to the sporting success and aesthetic value of their athlete.

These drugs have many different properties. They all affect your body differently. That effect often depends not only on the drug itself but on the type of athlete taking them and the sport in which they compete. Regulating bodies are still behind the game on this, but they know enough now to be able to offer some more flexibility that would perhaps help discourage those who abuse the system as it is.

Erythropoietin (EPO) is often seen as one of the more egregious examples of a PED by those who understand what it does. Many people will have first heard of it when Lance Armstrong was finally popped (after a long and generally convincing insistence of denial) by USADA back in 2012 for his use of it following a drawn-out saga lasting almost since Armstrong’s first Tour de France win in 1999. This was the highest profile case of our time, or at least at the time in 2012 (as there have been several other high profile doping cases since); as a result it has helped teach people some of the differences in PED’s and what they do. It also illuminated the unique position there is – and still remains – between the use of drugs in sport, and the drug tests used to catch these substances. For years people suspected Armstrong of some kind of cheating, yet he feigned innocence for as long as the authorities were unable to prove it, and those who supported him were always able to lean back on that until the curtain fell.

For the duration of the peak years of his career, Lance Armstrong duped the public, denying PED use despite accusations from those who knew what they were looking for.
For the duration of the peak years of his career, Lance Armstrong duped the public, denying PED use amidst accusations from those who knew the signs.

Now this indirectly leads us on to another brief point I want to make, and this may be the most pertinent one: PED’s are not magic pills. Sounds obvious enough, but it’s something the uninitiated seem to struggle with. Taking them does not suddenly give an athlete a free route into a final or mean they don’t need to put in hundreds of hours at the gym. Taking a few steroids doesn’t suddenly give a bodybuilder his toned physique or the ability to lift monumental weights.

The clue is in the name: they enhance what’s already there. If an athlete does not have the talent to begin with, or doesn’t want to bust their ass in training every day, then whatever PED’s they try taking, quite frankly, won’t have any more effect on their overall performance than a cheeseburger would. I’ve heard people say that athletes take performance enhancers because they’re sitting on their ass all day and can’t be bothered working out in the gym; please go and do some much-needed research if you think that way.

They don’t make you a superstar, they can’t give you talent; but they can help an athlete with talent become a superstar.

You may have a different opinion on all of this, and your opinion may be justified. As I always say, that’s fair enough. We should be having more conversations about this topic in general, whatever side of the fence you may fall on. As I’ve said, I’m not in favour of any athlete breaking the rules – if they do so without justification or reasoning, they should rightly be punished – I just think maybe those rules should be examined and questioned a little more. In most other areas that would be seen as healthy, but it seems in this area people get touchy about it.


The GAWA’s performance in France.

Norn Iron Euro 2016 pic 2.

If you’ve been paying any attention to football-related news this summer, or at least have friends who indirectly keep you updated, you’ll know it’s been a pretty big summer for the football teams of the home nations.

For Wales it’s not over yet, as they look forward to their first ever semi-final in their first tournament since 1958, after beating Belgium on Friday night.

Before that, they narrowly beat Northern Ireland 1-0 in one of the more underrated games in the last 16; a game that was set up thanks to a last minute Robbie Brady winner for the Republic of Ireland against Italy.

The Republic went on to give hosts France a bit of a scare as they also narrowly went down 2-1.

And of course we can’t forget England, who fell to what’s been called possibly their most embarrassing defeat ever against Iceland, who have 10% of their 300,000 population supporting them in attendance at Euro 2016. One thing’s for sure; none of us will be forgetting this tournament in a hurry.

Both sets of Irish fans have been honoured by the mayor of Paris for their unique, passionate contribution to the competition; Northern Irish fans in particular are responsible for popularising what’s been called the theme song of the tournament, “Will Grigg’s on Fire”, ironically about a player who didn’t even get on the pitch in any of the team’s four matches (wouldn’t have been fair on the opposition’s defence I suppose). It was said Northern Ireland were the only team whose fans have fans – though to be fair those Iceland fans are pretty unique too.

For our wee country, Norn Iron, to go out in the last 16 would have been expected going into the tournament; indeed we were delighted to even get there. The main disappointment I felt following the game against Wales wasn’t that we had went out, or that we hadn’t done as well as we could’ve hoped for; it was that the journey had now come to an end. The dream was over. But what a dream it had been while it lasted.

We went into the first game of our qualifying campaign, against Hungary almost two years ago (I’ve linked to it a few times before but hell, why not), having not won an away match since 2010. I remember that game like it was yesterday; Hungary going 1-0 up and thinking “here we go again”, then two goals from McGinn and Lafferty that came from nowhere in the last 10 minutes. Our form leading up to that match hadn’t been good; there was nothing to suggest what would come. Before we knew it we had won our first three qualifying games, two of them away from home, and the dream had begun.

Then, seeing us beat Ukraine on the big stage was unforgettable; the culmination of everything leading up to that point. We had proved we could win in France, with all eyes on us, rather than just make up the numbers and say we were “happy to be here” (I’m naturally a competitive guy so that would never have worked for me, haha). We had desire. We came to win. It was the most emotional football game I’ve ever watched, and the greatest result I’ve ever experienced. Unfortunately the only people I could share it with at the time were England fans who, through no fault of their own, were utterly incapable of comprehending what it meant to all of us back home.

The rest is now history. But every Northern Ireland fan will dare to dream once again when the World Cup qualifying campaign begins in September. I can say I’ve seen my country play – and win – at the European Championships; now I want to see them do the only thing that could possibly top it. I want to see them at a World Cup; and at this point confidence is high that we can make it to Russia in 2018. Should we somehow manage that, trust me: you’ve only seen the start of what our passionate fans can bring to the table. We’ll celebrate again like it’s our first, and our last.

Until next time, Norn Iron. You’ve done me proud.


Euro 2016 thoughts and preview.

Norn Iron Euro 2016.

Being a Northern Ireland fan living in England, one can perhaps imagine how disappointing it is for me to see that most others around me aren’t quite seeing Euro 2016 as a big deal in the same way that I personally do.

England, after all, qualify for most major tournaments, though the last few they have qualified for have either been underwhelming (2006, 2010, 2012) or downright disastrous (2014). Still, the feeling among England fans, even if they don’t openly state it, is that this kind of occasion every two years has become normal; an expected occurrence that fits appropriately alongside their team’s expected collapse under the pressure of media scrutiny.

This isn’t the case for Northern Ireland fans – indeed, it isn’t the case for the fans of most smaller countries that are not accustomed to this kind of opportunity; I imagine fans of Iceland, Albania and of course Wales are feeling a similar sense of anticipation right now. The last time our wee country qualified for anything like this was four years before I was born, in 1986; four years before that we had beaten hosts Spain on route to the World Cup quarter finals. We’re still the smallest nation ever to achieve such a thing – only Trinidad & Tobago were smaller in terms of World Cup participation, though they were unable to win a game or score a goal in 2006.

History, I feel, has been talked about enough. Though it’s something we can look back on with pride, it feels about time that new records were set in stone. And that’s what the next few weeks are all about; putting our generation in the history books as, at the very least, one of twenty-four participants at the 2016 European Championships in France. As for what we can do from here? Who knows… I optimistically think we have a chance of going quite far – but then again I have my fan’s hat on, which automatically disqualifies one from making a completely honest assessment – and at the least, I see us qualifying from our group and making the Last 16 stage. From there, it’s anyone’s game. We certainly fancy the quarter-finals, you can bet on that, and the bigger nations shall know by now that underestimating us will only lead to trouble.

Perhaps that may work against us. We’ll have to show even deeper qualities than what has already been on show during qualification. On that topic, I need to place on record here my frustration with a certain narrative being put out there in mainstream sports media. The narrative is that the expansion of the Euro’s from 16 to 24 teams has allowed teams such as Northern Ireland, Iceland, and Wales to qualify. I’ve been hearing this narrative primarily from BBC sports pundits for a number of months now, but it clearly overlooks the facts.

The fact is, Northern Ireland won their group. Again, they WON THEIR GROUP. Iceland narrowly missed out on top spot in their group, but did beat top seeds the Netherlands home and away in their qualification campaign. Similarly, Wales beat top seeds Belgium and went on a similar run which almost saw them win their group.

My point is simple: even if only 16 teams had qualified for this year’s tournament, Northern Ireland would have been one of them, likely Iceland and Wales too. No, the expanded competition is not to suit the smaller nations like us, as this mainstream narrative would have you believe. It is, in fact, to create a larger safety net for the bigger nations through which to qualify. Ironically, the Netherlands couldn’t take advantage of said expansion; the 2014 World Cup semi-finalists slumped to fourth in their group and couldn’t even manage a consolation play-off spot.

So let’s not kid ourselves that this expansion was to do smaller nations like us a favour; to say it was, is a disservice to a Northern Ireland team that won their group and have been on a 12-match unbeaten run since.

Anyway, this is also to say there’s been a lot written and spoken about Euro 2016 in sports media over the past few months, and I’m sure there will be much more to come. I don’t want to spend any more time making predictions or speculating on what the tournament has in store. Rest assured it’s going to be a BIG occasion for all of us. The time for talking is almost finished. Now I intend to go and enjoy it.

My pick to win Euro 2016: Belgium (narrowly beating Northern Ireland in a hotly contested final… perhaps)


Euro 2016 draw reaction.

Saturday evening was arguably the most anticipated night of the year (pertaining to the football calendar at least) for fans of nations like Wales, Northern Ireland, Iceland, and others who are not accustomed to regularly taking part in high profile international tournaments.

But on Saturday they all gathered in France for the Euro 2016 group stage draw. We knew this draw had potential to produce some intriguing ties, and it delivered. If you’re here you likely already know the details by now, but to recap:

  • England will play Wales in Group B. They underestimate Slovakia at their peril, while Russia have improved since a stuttering qualifying campaign, but on paper they should both have the quality to make the knockout stage.
  • Northern Ireland were drawn in Group C with world champions Germany, Poland and Ukraine. Two out of three of those sides are arguably the strongest from their respective pots, but to draw Ukraine from pot 2 was a nice stroke of luck that could provide the ‘Green and White army’ an opportunity to finish third in this group at the very least… while Germany and Poland would do well to remember our record against the bigger teams. I’m quietly confident.
  • Republic of Ireland found themselves drawn into this tournament’s “group of death” with Italy, Sweden, and Belgium, still ranked top of the Fifa rankings. A lot of people seem to be writing off Ireland’s chances here straight away, but I wouldn’t quite say that… they play Sweden in their first match; a crucial game they really have to win if they hope to advance. I’m backing them to do just that and make it out of this group to reach the last 16.
  • Group F – including Portugal, Iceland, Austria and Hungary – is intriguing in that it features un-fancied teams who have, to an extent, gone under the radar. Portugal were generally considered the weakest of the top seeds while Iceland, the smallest nation ever to qualify, are somewhat of an unknown quantity. Austria are my picks to win this group and surprise a few people at this tournament.
  • If France and Germany win their groups as expected, they’re set to meet in the semi-finals – so you can probably pencil that tie in right now. Whoever wins the ‘group of death’ will also be on this side of the bracket for the knockout rounds, but I’d easily back Germany against Belgium or Italy in the quarter-finals.
  • This does mean the other side of the tournament bracket appears more open. On the surface Spain look a safe bet to win Group D and make one of the semi-finals, but they are not the same team that won three tournaments in a row between 2008 and 2012; I’m expecting them to have a few issues navigating their group.
  • You can view the tournament bracket yourself right here.
  • Dare I say (though I know people often jump on you for suggesting such a thing), should England or Wales win Group B, either of them could be dark horses to make the semi-finals in what appears to be the easier half of the bracket.

Part of me does think it’s too early to be making firm predictions at this stage, but based on what we know and on where teams are at currently, here’s how I’d call the groups:

Group A: France winners, Switzerland runners-up, Romania to advance in third place.

Group B: Wales winners, England runners-up, Slovakia to advance in third place.

Group C: Germany winners, Northern Ireland runners-up, Poland to advance in third place.

Group D: Croatia winners, Spain runners-up, Turkey third.

Group E: Italy winners, Belgium runners-up, Rep. of Ireland to advance in third place.

Group F: Austria winners, Iceland runners-up, Portugal third.

Now, due to the uniqueness of this tournament bracket it’s tough even to call which of the third placed teams will be playing who in the last 16, so a part of this next stage is guess work – but then again this is all fantasy anyway. So let’s use a bit of imagination to predict the possibilities for the next stage…

Switzerland v Northern Ireland

Croatia v Slovakia

Wales v Poland

Austria v Belgium

Germany v Romania

Italy v Spain

France v Rep. of Ireland

England v Iceland

If I was forced to make a call on the quarter-finals from these possibilities I’d go something like this:

Northern Ireland v Croatia – Croatia to win after extra time

Wales v Belgium – Belgium to win

Germany v Italy – Germany to win

France v England – France to win after extra time


Germany to beat Belgium – Germany win Euro 2016 (?)


Looking forward to Euro 2016.

Euro 2016 Norn Iron pic 1.

I remember like it was yesterday; Northern Ireland’s first away win in four years in the first game of their Euro 2016 qualifying group – an unexpected 2-1 win at Hungary. That was fourteen months ago, and even with that (seemingly) one-off result none could have written the script that would play out over the following year as the team went on a run that ultimately saw them qualify for their first major tournament in my lifetime; the last time being at the 1986 World Cup in Mexico.

Potential banana skins were narrowly avoided along the way – ironically it was the same team we beat in that opening game that almost returned the favour in a pivotal, nervous and dramatic game back at the start of September – and in my previous comments on this qualifying campaign I refused to believe they would actually do it. But they did, even doing so in style; with a game to spare and winning their group.

This may indeed have been a ‘once in a lifetime’ occurrence in itself, but fans all around the British Isles have been spoilt with other unparalleled successes for the home nations. Wales went on a similar run, beating Belgium along the way to end an even longer wait for tournament qualification – Welsh fans haven’t enjoyed one since 1958. England won all ten games in their group (a group admittedly barren of any serious challenge) and were the first team to qualify. The Republic of Ireland qualified for their second consecutive European Championship and will be hoping for a more successful one than when they lost all three games without scoring a goal at Euro 2012.

One could say this has bred a feel-good atmosphere between fans of all these teams – it’s easier to be friends when (almost) everyone’s doing well after all – and this feeling of friendly rivalry will hopefully result in a tournament that’s memorable for all the right reasons in France next year. The draw for the groups, which will be six groups of four teams, takes place on the 12th of December and I’ll be analysing that in closer detail when the time comes.

For now, the seedings have been announced and I’d like to do the whole ‘speculation’ thing. Who would I like to see in Northern Ireland’s group? What are the best/ worse case scenarios for the home nations? Is there a potential ‘group of death’ in waiting? Let’s have a look.

Seedings are as follows:

Euro 2016 draw pots, pic 1.

Now even though Belgium are currently ranked top of the Fifa rankings, if I’m being honest they’re probably still the most attractive draw in pot 1 as it pertains to wanting to progress. Stick Northern Ireland against Belgium and I’d be reasonably confident. Belgium have excellent individual players for sure but questions remain over whether they truly ‘gel’ as a team – and I’m not convinced they had an overly challenging qualifying group so their recent results may be slightly deceiving.

Italy are the standout team in pot 2 and most teams in every other pot will be hoping to avoid them. Pot 3 arguably looks even more dangerous with Czech Republic, Sweden and Poland lurking, none of whom will be comfortable draws for anyone. Meanwhile the top seeds will perhaps be looking at Wales and the Republic of Ireland in pot 4 with trepidation, having seen them beat Belgium and world champions Germany in their respective qualifying groups.

I’ve had the feeling for a while that Northern Ireland are going to draw hosts France. There’s no real reason for thinking that aside from some vague superstition, but if we end up with France, Germany or Spain I think we’ll embrace it. The big occasion and memories are the main reasons for being there after all, and those fixtures would certainly leave lasting impressions whatever the result. England and Portugal lie somewhere between those teams and Belgium, in that you know they’re going to present something of a challenge but they’re not quite in the top tier either…

As a Northern Ireland fan, Portugal are probably my least preferred draw in that first pot. With the presence of a special player like Ronaldo you can never quite be confident that you’ll beat them, while at the same time they don’t present the desired ‘marquee’ fixture one would like if you’re not going to progress further. I’m confident we could beat England, but the sickening feeling it would leave if they were to beat us instead makes me wary of saying I’d be comfortable with that draw. Save it for the quarter-finals or something like that and we’ll take them to penalties if needs be.

I’d imagine Wales and Ireland fans would take a similar stance on that first pot. It’s worth pointing out that the ‘bigger’ teams will perhaps consider both of them more of a threat than we are though; to what extent that psychological edge might come into play remains to be seen.

Taking current rankings into account, there are a few possibilities for a ‘group of death’ at this tournament: Germany/ Spain (pot 1), Italy (pot 2), Czech Rep./ Sweden (pot 3), and Wales (pot 4) would be the most potent combination in my eyes.

From England’s point of view, they’ll no doubt be hoping for a decent start to this tournament after the disaster of the last one (having gone out of last year’s World Cup without winning a game). Top priority for them would likely be avoiding Italy – who were in their group in Brazil – as well as the other home nations, all of whom would be strongly motivated to inflict more tournament misery on their frequently overrated neighbours. Best scenario for England would probably look something like this: Austria/ Ukraine (pot 2), Slovakia/ Hungary (pot 3), Albania (pot 4).

Iceland represent something of an unknown quantity in pot 4, as one can’t yet say whether their recent qualifying form will reverberate in France, but I’d imagine they wouldn’t be a comfortable draw for the English – they’d definitely be full throttle in that match, this being their first-ever major tournament. Worst case scenario for England? Italy (2), Czech Rep./ Sweden (3), Ireland/ Wales (4). I’d say they’ll be sweating should that kind of combination come up.

When all’s said and done, the lineup of teams and possibilities for Euro 2016 actually looks quite intriguing. Whatever awaits for Northern Ireland, in the end no one’s really going to complain whoever comes out of the hat. Taking some time to speculate on these possibilities beforehand is all part of the experience; an experience that will take another step further next month. I’ll be back on the 13th of December, a day after the draw takes place, to reflect on the hands that have been dealt and offer my early predictions for the tournament.


A quick word on Freedom.

It’s been a harrowing weekend.

We’ve witnessed events in Paris and Beirut that we’d rather not believe are real; the latter happening only a day after we remembered the end of world war 1 and those lives lost during past conflicts. Wars fought and lives given for the very freedom that was once again under attack in France’s capital city on Friday evening. The second time this year Paris has been subject to such grief.

The world is now engulfed in a very different kind of conflict than those terrible world wars that past generations came through and survived. When it was a clear ‘us against them’ situation, some might say it was simpler; almost easier to comprehend. You knew where you stood at least. But now?

Now those committing the atrocities might be our neighbours. Individually, they’re not really fighting for any ideology that we can understand. Some propaganda fed to them by other twisted sub-human beings might have promised them specific rewards after death, the quality of which is based on how much innocent blood they can spill in the process. Then again I suppose in their eyes, we aren’t innocent.

I’m not going to get into religious ideology. I think what’s going on here – on our side of the world and the other – is bigger and even more serious than some absurd extremist beliefs. The real issue I believe is one we will only see when the next generation observes our situation with the benefit of hindsight and context.

Right now the Western response to this crisis – and it is indeed very much at crisis point by now – is to tighten security. Close off the borders. Let no one leave or enter without the appropriate, increasingly stringent checks. If the terrorists wanted to make life feel just a little more awkward, a little more fearful and apprehensive for us, they’ve already succeeded to some extent. And that won’t stop them from trying again – testing just how far they can push.

No one yet seems to be looking at the bigger picture. Asking the obvious – yet at the same time, more uncomfortable – questions. Often our problem in the West has been turning a bit of a blind eye to certain things building up in the Middle East. I’m not just talking politically. I’m talking about the fundamental way in which we live our lives. One can’t deny that we, in Europe and the US, are much more… liberal in certain things. We rightly embrace the freedoms our soldiers fought and died for over the last century; but we do so often without pausing to consider other countries and entire regions in the world who do not yet have those same freedoms – without considering how our freedom could somehow be twisted to look negative, in the hands of a twisted individual who perhaps knows how to get others dancing to their tune. ‘Out of sight, out of mind’ is an overused phrase, but I fear for many of us in Western society, it has too often turned out to be true as we enjoy our own hard-earned freedom.

The attacks on Paris Friday evening exploited the fact that it is traditionally the first night of the weekend; a night when people feel free to go out and relax, having worked hard for that right all week long. It was a night when the France football team were playing one of their last ‘friendly’ matches before the country hosts Euro 2016 next summer. This was a typical Friday night in Paris; the capital city of a proud country preparing to host the next major European sporting event. In many ways, Europe’s cultural centrepiece. Paris is a top tourist destination for anyone, no matter where you live in the world.

That is why these particular attacks have garnered so much more attention than other similar atrocities happening in the world. Even over the past week there will have been horrific incidents elsewhere that the media hasn’t reported as much on and we therefore haven’t cared so much about. For a lot of people, this felt much closer to home. The scale of the attack, the death toll was greater than any of us could have imagined when we first heard the news trickling in. I was keeping up with the football updates through the BBC live text service at the time. When news first broke that there had been an attack, it seemed there was only a small number of casualties. It seemed an isolated, though sad and unfortunate incident. But those who organised this whole thing clearly wanted to make a big impact; possibly one that would reverberate through to next summer’s tournament.

It’s been slightly heartening in the face of this tragedy to see that likely won’t be the case; that France is determined not to cower in fear, but to continue on as they would, in honour of the victims. That, I’m sure, is what they all would have wanted; for their great country to grasp the opportunity next summer to be involved in positive headlines once again.

On the other hand, security will now be heightened. Paranoia will now be slightly raised. It will take some time for the anger and grief to begin to subside. I don’t wish to detract from those things. We are right to be angry about this situation and interested in the possible measures that may have helped us prevent it. As I’ve said though, I suspect those necessary measures are somewhat more complicated than simply eradicating IS.

Extremism will continue to exist in some form unless we begin to look at its root causes and ask what part we may have played in creating them. What we can do to help prevent it from occurring again in future, rather than retreating to defence mode and attacking only when this extremism inevitably interferes with our personal lives.

I dream, like many others, of seeing a world in which everyone is free to choose how they live. Free of those who want to control and manipulate them; free to express themselves by having access to top quality education that encourages free thinking and inclusion; free to enjoy themselves without having to worry about someone wanting to murder them.

I grieve as much as everyone else right now; though I don’t feel much of a pull to get involved in the social media campaigns that Western social justice warriors try to kickstart. These attacks in Paris shouldn’t only represent an opportunity to start a new ‘trend’ or ‘hashtag’. THINK about why this happened. Think about what you can really contribute to helping stop it from happening again. It’s not about simply increasing security so we can safeguard and enjoy our privileges. It’s not about merely ‘praying for’ or saying our ‘thoughts go out to’ the victims and their families. There will be more victims unless we start to properly look at ourselves as well as those attacking us. I’m pretty sure everyone could put more thought into it than just clicking ‘like’ and ‘share’.


Weekend preview: Euro 2016 qualifying.

Wales team pic 1.

This weekend international football takes centre stage again, as the Home Nations continue their respective campaigns to reach the European Championship tournament being held in France next year.

But first, let’s talk about those Fifa world rankings. They made news again this week as Wales found themselves ranked 9th, one place above England in 10th and, somewhat hilariously, above reigning European champions Spain (11th) and World Cup semi-finalists the Netherlands (12th). Furthermore Belgium – a team of great individuals who don’t necessarily make a great team – are still ranked second despite defeat to Wales in their last match and Romania, with whom Northern Ireland drew 0-0 in a damp squib last time out, are somehow up there in 7th.

Manager Chris Coleman has sensibly moved to reiterate that the rankings are basically meaningless (useful only for bragging rights among fans perhaps, and to make group draws more practical) and their real task as a team is to qualify for Euro 2016 next year – should they fail to do that from their current position, then they’ll be classed as failures regardless and no hypothetical ranking is going to be consolation for anyone in that case. I have nothing to add to that opinion other than to affirm its obviousness.

Tonight Wales (somewhat appropriately, considering said ranking) spearhead the Home Nations’ challenge as they travel to face Cyprus. Win, and they’ll be within touching distance of the finals. I’ve already said I think they’ll get there comfortably from this point and that task should go one more step towards completion this evening. Prediction: Cyprus 1-3 Wales

Moving on to Friday, Scotland and Northern Ireland take centre stage to play their part. Both of their fixtures, the former against Georgia and the latter against the Faroe Islands, are quite simply must-win if they want to sustain their challenge. Unfortunately both matches also represent potential banana skins. Scotland know this all too well as it was a defeat to Georgia in 2007 that single-handedly derailed their Euro 2008 qualifying campaign when they were in a similar position (indeed it was, at that point, even better) to the one they face now. However, Georgia themselves have been in an almighty slump since then – they’ve only won four matches between that win and now – and I don’t see Scotland slipping up this time. Prediction: Georgia 0-2 Scotland

Being a Northern Irish native, I of course would like to see them qualify most of all. I also harbour unpleasant memories of slipping up against supposed group ‘whipping boys’ in previous qualifying campaigns, most recently an embarrassing defeat to Luxembourg (in what was their first home win since 1972) and a draw with none other than the Faroe Islands themselves before that. So I’m not taking this game for granted, but I have to say I still fancy my home team to come out winners. The Faroe Islands have already won two games in this qualifying campaign, but those were against Greece – who seem to have fallen off the face of the earth – and I think they were rather deceptive results. Prediction: Faroe Islands 1-4 Northern Ireland

On Saturday, England play San Marino in perhaps the least interesting of the weekend’s fixtures. The English have arguably the easiest group and San Marino are frankly their easiest opponents. They’ll obviously make it seven wins out of seven, but as per usual I don’t think we’ll see truly ‘vintage’ England – pundits will still be using phrases like ‘workman-like performance’ and ‘efficient style of play’ by the end of the weekend… Yawn. Prediction: San Marino 0-5 England

Moving swiftly on, the action picks up again on Sunday with Wales at home to Israel. This could be the match where Wales effectively seal their place at Euro 2016 so expect a bit of a party atmosphere, providing they don’t slip up against Cyprus beforehand. Regardless, with the kind of form Wales have been in recently, beating Belgium last match day, one wouldn’t want to bet against them at home. Prediction: Wales 2-1 Israel

Monday sees two of the biggest games yet: Scotland vs Germany and Northern Ireland vs Hungary, both at home, both vital in determining where each team will finish in the group. Being at home, the Scots will no doubt fancy their chances against World champions Germany, especially since the latter hasn’t been in sparkling form during this qualifying campaign (having said that, they’re still on course to finish in the top 2). I have a feeling Scotland might just get something from this game, and I have a feeling Germany won’t be too displeased to get out of Scotland with a point either. Prediction: Scotland 1-1 Germany

Northern Ireland play the team against whom this qualifying campaign started in such surprising and glorious fashion. The Hungary team on Monday I feel will be a different one from then, their form having improved to the point where they themselves come to Belfast knowing a win could help them steal that coveted top 2 spot from under our noses. This is going to be a tough fixture to get through unscathed, no doubts there, and it is even bigger than the overhyped Romania match earlier in the summer. Kyle Lafferty will need to be more clinical in front of goal than he was in that game if we’re to be celebrating come Monday evening. Frankly I’d probably be content with a draw at this point (providing the Faroe Islands result pans out accurately too…) as it would mean retaining that top 2 spot going into the remaining two games. Prediction: Northern Ireland 2-2 Hungary

Finally, England host Switzerland on Tuesday evening in a slightly more interesting – if no less routine – fixture for the British media to try and excite themselves over. I do hope the Swiss come with the intention of taking it to England in an effort to make the group look less predictable – they were, after all, portrayed as the biggest threat in this group – but in the end I expect England to still have enough in a fairly typical home game. Hopefully we’ll get to see some new faces rather than watching Wayne Rooney run around half the pitch and ultimately praised for ‘working hard’. Prediction: England 3-1 Switzerland